An analysis of the studies which have been conducted with a new, increasingly popular, form of psychotherapy (Acceptance and Commitment Therapy) is raising doubts on the specificity of the strategy. The study has been published by a group of Dutch investigators headed by Prof. Emmelkamp in the current issue of Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics. [continue reading…]

In Friday’s Financial Times Richard Tomkins takes a look at Obsessive Compulsive Disorder.

According to a paper appearing in last month’s American Journal of Psychiatry, an estimated 21-25 per cent of individuals could be said to have borderline OCD, meaning they have obsessions or compulsions that meet at least some of the diagnostic criteria. Admittedly, more than one-third of these people are also suffering from another anxiety disorder or depression – but according to the paper, that still leaves an estimated 13-17 per cent of otherwise “normal” people – about one in 15 of us – suffering from at least some symptoms of OCD.

So is there a little bit of OCD in all of us? Could someone you know be afflicted?

The term “OCD” has recently displaced “anal” in contemporary slang as a way of describing people who are more than usually meticulous, pernickety or pedantic – the sort of people who are never satisfied unless things are just right. If this reflected a greater understanding of obsessive compulsive disorder, it might be no bad thing. In fact, it has simply increased the degree of misunderstanding by confusing two different conditions with almost the same name. “Anal” people do not usually have OCD at all; they simply have an obsessive compulsive personality type, meaning they’re a bit fussy. People with OCD, in contrast, are suffering from a serious anxiety disorder that greatly impinges on their lives.

Link to read to read : Is there a bit of OCD in us all?
Source: The Financial Times

Around 1970, psychologist Walter Mischel launched a classic experiment. He left a succession of 4-year-olds in a room with a bell and a marshmallow. If they rang the bell, he would come back and they could eat the marshmallow. If, however, they didn’t ring the bell and waited for him to come back on his own, they could then have two marshmallows. …. continue reading

Source: San Francisco Chronicle